Share your policy idea

I propose a Youth-Centred Open Legislative Information and Participation Policy for Oyo State to ensure that young people have access to legislative information and meaningful opportunities to influence decisions that affect their future.

The policy would establish youth-friendly digital platforms to publish proposed bills, passed laws, legislative proceedings, and budget information in simple, accessible language. It would also introduce regular youth legislative forums, school and community civic education programmes, and structured consultations between young people and lawmakers.

As young people make up a significant part of our population, their voices must be reflected in policymaking. This policy would empower youth to understand their rights, contribute to legislation, monitor government performance, and hold public officials accountable.

By institutionalising youth participation and promoting transparency, Oyo State can build a more informed, engaged, and responsible generation of leaders while strengthening democratic governance for the future.

A Policy Brief on Graduate Unemployment and Entrepreneurial Financing in Oyo State, Nigeria

Policy Recommendation

Establish an Oyo State Graduate Enterprise Fund that provides ₦700,000 in startup capital to eligible newly graduated university students to establish viable businesses.

1. Problem Statement

Many young people in Oyo State complete their undergraduate studies with hopes of securing meaningful employment, contributing to innovation and creating enterprises. Yet, for some, these ambitions remain unrealised because they cannot secure suitable jobs or obtain the financial resources needed to establish businesses. Educated youths with the willingness and capacity to contribute to the state's economic development may consequently spend years competing for limited employment opportunities, often alongside applicants with different levels of educational experience. Meanwhile, those who wish to pursue entrepreneurship may lack the capital, equipment and support required to translate their knowledge into viable enterprises.

This situation raises questions about the economic value young graduates can derive from their education when opportunities to apply their knowledge remain limited. Without practical pathways into employment and enterprise creation, the state risks underutilising the skills, creativity and productive potential of its young population.

Oyo State therefore needs a policy that complements conventional employment and skills-development programmes with accessible startup financing. A Graduate Enterprise Fund providing ₦700,000 to eligible newly graduated university students could help bridge the gap between educational attainment and entrepreneurial opportunity, enabling graduates to establish businesses, generate income and potentially create employment for others.

2. Research Questions

This policy brief is guided by five questions:

What evidence demonstrates that young graduates in Oyo State face barriers to suitable employment and entrepreneurship?

What factors prevent graduates from translating their educational qualifications and business ideas into sustainable economic activity?

What can previous youth employment and skills-development programmes in Oyo State teach policymakers about the limitations of training without adequate startup resources?

How could a ₦700,000 startup grant improve graduates' ability to establish and sustain businesses?

What implementation, accountability and monitoring arrangements would help ensure that public funds produce measurable economic and social benefits?

3. Evidence and Key Findings

Finding 1: Graduate unemployment remains a concern in Ibadan

A study by Onyeonoru and Azeez, published in the Ibadan Journal of the Social Sciences, examined ICT skills gaps and graduate unemployment in Ibadan.

The researchers surveyed 283 graduates across five local government areas in the Ibadan metropolitan area. They reported that 62 respondents, representing 22% of the sample, were unemployed. Another 133 respondents, or 47%, were employed, while 87, or 31%, were self-employed or engaged in freelance work.

The study also found that 96.5% of respondents reported proficiency in email, social media and web-based facilities, while 96.8% reported proficiency in Microsoft Word. However, proficiency was lower in specialised ICT skills: 49.1% for programming and coding, 56.9% for graphic design and 42.7% for website and mobile application design.

Interpretation: The findings indicate that educational attainment and basic digital proficiency do not automatically translate into suitable employment. Skills relevant to specific occupations may matter, but the study does not establish that skills gaps alone cause graduate unemployment.

The results also show that some graduates pursue self-employment and freelance work. Policymakers should therefore consider both access to paid jobs and opportunities to establish viable enterprises.

Source: Onyeonoru and Azeez, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Skills Gaps and Graduate Unemployment in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Published in the Ibadan Journal of the Social Sciences, 2022.

Finding 2: Previous youth employment programmes experienced startup-financing difficulties

A study titled Operation, Problems, and Prospects of Youth Employment Programmes in Oyo State, Nigeria examined the state's Skill Acquisition Scheme and Youth Empowerment Scheme, commonly referred to as YES-O.

The research identified inadequate funding, insufficient startup capital, weak monitoring arrangements and the absence of effective exit strategies among the challenges affecting programme performance.

The study reported that 87.5% of surveyed skills-acquisition trainees had acquired new skills. Nevertheless, 80% considered the available startup package inadequate for establishing their own businesses. The study also reported that 61.5% of programme administrators said the skills-acquisition scheme had no link with microcredit institutions.

Furthermore, 67% of surveyed YES-O cadets believed that the programme had not positively affected them.

These results relate to the particular programmes and historical samples examined by the researchers. They should not be interpreted as current estimates for all unemployed graduates in Oyo State.

Interpretation: The evidence illustrates a potential gap between training and economic independence. Skills acquisition can improve a participant's capabilities, but its economic benefits may remain limited when participants lack the equipment, working capital and financing arrangements needed to apply those skills commercially.

For a graduate enterprise policy, startup funding should therefore be treated as part of a broader package that includes business development support, market access and post-disbursement monitoring.

Source: Operation, Problems, and Prospects of Youth Employment Programmes in Oyo State, Nigeria, Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 2014.

Finding 3: Oyo State has previously recognised the need to combine training with enterprise support.

On 28–29 May 2024, the Oyo State Government announced the Omituntun 2.0 Enterprise Skill Development Programme, which was intended to train and equip 500 youths across the state's 33 local government areas.

The programme targeted young graduates and included entrepreneurship, business management, financial sustainability, employability, leadership and mentorship. The announcement also stated that selected participants would receive starter packs after completing the programme.

Interpretation: The initiative demonstrates that entrepreneurship and youth economic empowerment have already featured in the state's policy agenda.

A proposed Graduate Enterprise Fund could build on this approach by giving eligible graduates access to a clearly defined amount of startup capital. However, before establishing a new scheme, the government should review the implementation and outcomes of the 2024 programme to identify lessons, avoid duplication and determine which support mechanisms have been effective.

The available announcement confirms the programme's stated intentions, not the number of businesses subsequently established or their survival rates.

Source: Radio Nigeria Ibadan, Oyo Unveils Plans to Train Youths, 29 May 2024.

4. Synthesis and Policy Interpretation

Taken together, these studies point to three policy considerations.

First, graduate unemployment cannot be addressed through skills training alone. Graduates also need access to suitable employment opportunities and practical ways to apply their knowledge.

Second, entrepreneurship can provide an alternative route into productive economic activity, but a business idea does not become a viable enterprise simply because its owner has completed a university degree. Capital, equipment, customers, working capital and business management support may all be necessary.

Third, previous youth employment programmes provide a reason to examine how training, financing and post-training support can be better connected. Public investment should be assessed against measurable outcomes, rather than the number of people trained or the number of grants distributed.

The proposed ₦700,000 grant is a policy recommendation, not an amount established by the cited research as sufficient for every business. Its adequacy will depend on the type of enterprise, startup costs, location and current market prices. The government should therefore validate the proposed amount through a cost assessment and pilot programme before committing to statewide implementation.

5. Policy Recommendations

Recommendation 1: Establish the Oyo State Graduate Enterprise Fund

The state government should establish a dedicated fund providing a startup grant of ₦700,000 to eligible newly graduated university students who demonstrate a viable business proposal.

The fund should prioritise enterprise creation rather than treating the payment as unrestricted personal income. Applicants should identify the business they intend to establish, their target customers, the resources required and how the proposed enterprise will generate revenue.

Eligibility criteria should be transparent, publicly available and consistently applied.

Recommendation 2: Make funding accessible and equitable

The programme should be open to eligible graduates across all 33 local government areas, including applicants from rural communities and those whose families cannot provide startup capital.

Selection should be based on published criteria, business feasibility and applicants' readiness to implement their proposals. Educational institutions, youth organisations, professional associations and community groups could help publicise the programme.

The government should also provide accessible application arrangements for applicants with disabilities and those with limited internet access.

Recommendation 3: Link funding to practical business support

Recipients should receive basic business-development support covering budgeting, bookkeeping, customer acquisition, pricing, digital marketing, regulatory compliance and business sustainability.

Where appropriate, the government should connect beneficiaries with experienced entrepreneurs, relevant professional associations, suppliers and potential customers.

The objective should be to help graduates establish businesses capable of generating sustainable income, rather than merely distributing funds.

Recommendation 4: Introduce transparent disbursement and accountability mechanisms

The fund should publish its eligibility criteria, application procedures, selection methodology, award amounts and reporting arrangements.

Disbursement should be traceable, with clear safeguards against political favouritism, duplicate applications, conflicts of interest and diversion of funds.

Beneficiaries should submit proportionate reports on business establishment, expenditure and operations. Monitoring should support problem-solving and business sustainability rather than impose excessive administrative burdens on small enterprises.

Recommendation 5: Pilot the ₦700,000 grant before statewide expansion

The government should begin with a pilot covering a representative selection of local government areas and different enterprise sectors.

The pilot should assess whether ₦700,000 is sufficient for the types of businesses selected, how quickly beneficiaries establish their enterprises and what additional support they require.

An independent evaluation should compare outcomes among grant recipients with an appropriate comparison group where feasible.

The state should use the findings to determine whether the grant amount, eligibility criteria and delivery arrangements need adjustment before expanding the programme.

Recommendation 6: Measure employment and enterprise outcomes

The government should publish periodic reports covering:

Number of applications received and grants awarded.

Distribution of beneficiaries across local government areas.

Number of businesses established and operating after 6 and 12 months.

Beneficiary income and changes in financial independence.

Number of additional jobs created and sustained.

Participation of women, persons with disabilities and applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Evidence of misuse, business closure and lessons for programme improvement.

These indicators would enable policymakers and the public to assess whether the programme is achieving its intended objectives.

6. Sample Budget and Potential Reach

At ₦700,000 per recipient, the direct grant requirement would be:

  Number of beneficiaries Direct grant allocation    500 graduates ₦350,000,000  1,000 graduates ₦700,000,000  2,000 graduates ₦1,400,000,000  5,000 graduates ₦3,500,000,000  These figures cover grant payments only. They exclude administration, business training, mentoring, monitoring, independent evaluation and other programme costs.

The government should establish the total budget after estimating the number of eligible applicants, the expected cost of delivering the programme and the available fiscal resources.

7. Conclusion

Young graduates represent an important source of knowledge, creativity and entrepreneurial potential for Oyo State. Yet educational attainment does not guarantee access to suitable employment or the capital needed to establish a business.

Research conducted in Ibadan identifies graduate unemployment and specialised skills gaps, while an earlier evaluation of youth employment programmes in Oyo State highlights difficulties in translating training into sustainable livelihoods when startup financing is inadequate.

The state government should respond by establishing a carefully designed Graduate Enterprise Fund that provides ₦700,000 in startup capital to eligible newly graduated university students, supported by practical business development assistance, transparent selection and rigorous monitoring.

Access to justice should not depend on how much money a person has. Yet in Oyo State, as in much of Nigeria, many low-income residents cannot afford a lawyer, and many do not know their rights or where to turn for help. The consequences are familiar: land disputes that drag on for years, detainees awaiting trial without representation, domestic violence that goes unreported, and tenancy and wage conflicts that the weaker party simply absorbs. For these citizens, the justice system exists on paper but feels out of reach in practice.

A practical answer is a Community Legal Aid and Awareness Programme, coordinated by the state Ministry of Justice and built on partnerships rather than a large new bureaucracy. The Ministry would provide coordination, a dedicated budget line, and a small secretariat. The Legal Aid Council's Oyo office would handle representation in eligible cases and supervise paralegals. Branches of the Nigerian Bar Association would contribute pro bono lawyers on a quarterly roster, while university law clinics would offer supervised student advice and outreach. Civil society organisations, traditional rulers, and faith leaders would supply what no government office can: community trust and outreach in local languages.

The programme would deliver five core services. First, legal awareness campaigns through Yoruba and English radio programmes, town-hall sessions, and simple guides on land, tenancy, police rights, gender-based violence, and employment. Second, community paralegals, trained and placed in existing facilities such as local government secretariats, market associations, and religious centres, who would serve as the first point of contact. Third, mediation and alternative dispute resolution to settle minor civil and family disputes early, before they harden into costly litigation. Fourth, a referral system in which paralegals screen cases and direct eligible ones to the Legal Aid Council or pro bono lawyers. Finally, monthly legal clinics rotating through underserved communities. Eligibility would be means-tested using simple criteria such as income, dependants, and vulnerability, with priority for women, children, persons with disabilities, and detainees awaiting trial.

Realism demands a phased approach. In the first three months, the state would sign a memorandum of understanding with partners, form a steering committee, and recruit and train paralegals. Over the following nine months, the programme would run as a pilot in three to five local government areas, mixing urban and rural settings, before undergoing a review. In the second year, it would expand to more areas based on what the evidence shows. Costs would remain modest because the model leans on existing institutions and volunteers. A state allocation would cover coordination, paralegal stipends, and outreach, supplemented by development-partner grants, bar association contributions, and in-kind university support.

Success would be measured openly: the number of people reached and cases handled, the share of disputes resolved through mediation, the average time to resolution, user satisfaction disaggregated by gender, and the number of pretrial detainees assisted.

The programme faces real risks, but each has a safeguard. Funding gaps can be reduced through multi-year commitments and a diverse donor base. Quality can be protected through lawyer supervision and a binding code of conduct for paralegals. Duplication can be avoided by mapping existing providers first and coordinating with them. Low uptake can be countered by relying on trusted local messengers and local languages.

Ultimately, justice is meaningful only when ordinary people can actually seek it. By starting small, proving results, and expanding on evidence, Oyo State can close the gap between its citizens and the institutions meant to protect them, at a cost the state can sustain.

THE PROBLEM

Badagry is a community with a rich history, an agricultural tradition, educational institutions, and a strategic location along the Lagos–Seme international corridor. Yet, an important question remains: how can these advantages translate into sustainable economic opportunities for the people who live here?

Badagry has farmers, fishers, traders, students, and young people who could contribute to a stronger local economy. However, agricultural production alone cannot deliver its full economic value if farmers struggle to access processing facilities, storage, reliable markets, and investment. Similarly, completing secondary school should open doors to meaningful opportunities, but young people also need practical pathways into employment, entrepreneurship, and further skills development within their communities.

Why should a young person grow up in an agricultural community, attend school there, and still struggle to see a viable future there?

This is not simply an agricultural problem. It is a question of inclusion and local economic development. When production is disconnected from processing, markets, and industry, farmers can lose opportunities to earn more, while young people miss out on jobs across the wider agricultural value chain.

Badagry’s proximity to an international border offers potential for trade and distribution, but location alone does not guarantee prosperity. The community needs the infrastructure, skills, investment, and economic connections required to turn its potential into tangible benefits.

MY POLICY PROPOSAL

I propose that the Lagos State Government, working with Badagry Local Government, relevant agricultural agencies, educational institutions, farmer cooperatives, and private-sector investors, establish a Badagry Agro-Industrial and Youth Inclusion Initiative.

The objective would be to connect local agricultural production with processing, skills development, employment, and market access, while ensuring that women, young people, and smallholder farmers are not left behind.

Rather than immediately committing public funds to a large industrial complex, the government should begin with a feasibility study and a targeted pilot based on Badagry’s actual agricultural output, infrastructure, market demand, and existing businesses.

The initiative would have four main components.

1. CONNECT FARMERS TO PROCESSING AND MARKETS

The first priority would be to understand what farmers produce, the challenges they face after harvesting, and where value is lost between production and sale.

The government should work with farmer associations, agricultural extension officers, processors, and buyers to identify one or two viable agricultural value chains for an initial pilot.

Depending on the findings, the programme could support shared facilities for processing, storage, packaging, and product handling. These facilities would enable participating farmers and small businesses to improve the quality and marketability of their products.

Potential support could also include better market information, links to institutional buyers, and training in product standards and basic business management.

The goal is to help farmers move beyond selling raw produce where viable alternatives exist, allowing more value to be created and retained within Badagry.

2. CREATE A PATHWAY FROM SCHOOL TO EMPLOYMENT

Badagry’s young people should be able to see agriculture as more than working on a farm. The sector also offers opportunities in food processing, packaging, logistics, equipment maintenance, quality control, marketing, and agribusiness management.

I propose a school-to-skills pathway connecting selected secondary schools and other training institutions with local farms, processors, agricultural businesses, and technical training providers.

Students could participate in career talks, practical demonstrations, supervised industry visits, and introductory agricultural enterprise projects. Young people who have completed school could access structured apprenticeships and practical training linked to real business needs.

The programme should prioritise skills that employers and local businesses actually require. Where possible, training providers and participating businesses should agree on employment or apprenticeship pathways before recruitment begins.

Education should not simply prepare young people to leave their communities; it should also equip them to transform them.

3. INCLUDE WOMEN AND SUPPORT SMALLHOLDER FARMERS TO GROW

Economic development must reach the people who are already doing the work, not only those with the resources to establish new businesses.

Women involved in farming, processing, and trading should have fair access to training, shared facilities, market connections, and suitable financing opportunities.

For older and established smallholder farmers, the initiative should focus on helping viable businesses grow through improved production practices, cooperative purchasing, access to buyers, value addition, and better financial management.

The objective is not to suggest that every smallholder farmer can automatically become a middle-income entrepreneur. It is to create a more realistic pathway for farmers who want to expand their operations, improve their earnings, and build more secure livelihoods.

Support should be based on transparent eligibility criteria, with particular attention to farmers and entrepreneurs who face barriers to accessing existing opportunities.

4. TURN BADAGRY’S LOCATION INTO AN ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE

Badagry’s position along the Lagos–Seme corridor creates opportunities worth examining, particularly in agricultural distribution, food processing, storage, packaging, and trade-related services.

However, these opportunities require deliberate planning. The government should assess transport links, electricity, water supply, business infrastructure, market demand, and the requirements for lawful cross-border trade.

The initiative could convene local businesses, logistics operators, farmers, processors, and relevant public agencies to identify the most promising opportunities and barriers to investment.

The aim should be to attract businesses that create local jobs and purchase from local producers, rather than assuming that proximity to an international route will automatically generate development.

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

PHASE ONE: RESEARCH AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION — MONTHS 1–3

Badagry Local Government, in collaboration with relevant Lagos State agencies, should conduct a baseline assessment covering:

1. The main agricultural products and seasonal production patterns in the area.
2. The processing, storage, and market-access challenges facing farmers.
3. The skills and employment needs of local businesses.
4. The interests and barriers facing young people, women, and smallholder farmers.
5. Existing facilities, infrastructure gaps, and potential private-sector partners.

Farmers, students, women-led enterprises, youth groups, schools, and local businesses should be consulted before the pilot is designed.

PHASE TWO: LAUNCH A TARGETED PILOT — MONTHS 4–9

Based on the findings, the government should select a viable agricultural value chain and establish partnerships with participating farmers, processors, buyers, and training institutions.

The pilot could introduce shared processing or storage arrangements where a clear business case exists, alongside practical training and apprenticeship opportunities for young people.

Support for participating enterprises should be transparent and linked to demonstrated needs, realistic business plans, and market opportunities.

PHASE THREE: MEASURE RESULTS AND IMPROVE — MONTHS 10–12

The government should assess the pilot’s performance, including whether farmers have gained better market access, whether young people have secured paid work, and whether supported businesses can generate sufficient revenue to continue operating.

The findings should be published in an accessible format and discussed with the participating communities.

Expansion should depend on evidence of impact, operational feasibility, and sustainable funding.

MEASURING SUCCESS

The initiative should establish baseline data before setting final targets. Its progress could be measured through:

1. The number of farmers connected to processors and reliable buyers.
2. The number of women-led and youth-led enterprises participating.
3. The number of young people completing training and securing paid employment or apprenticeships.
4. Changes in participating farmers’ sales, earnings, or access to markets.
5. The volume and value of agricultural products processed locally.
6. The number of businesses that remain operational after receiving support.
7. The proportion of programme beneficiaries who report improved access to economic opportunities.
8. The cost of implementation relative to the benefits achieved.

These indicators would help distinguish genuine economic progress from activities that look impressive but produce limited lasting results.

FUNDING AND ACCOUNTABILITY

The initiative could combine appropriate allocations from government budgets with private investment, business partnerships, and development-partner support where available.

Government funding should prioritise coordination, feasibility studies, essential enabling infrastructure, agricultural extension, and targeted skills development. Private-sector partners could contribute technical expertise, operate processing facilities, purchase agricultural products, and provide work-based training.

The Lagos State House of Assembly could support appropriate budgetary scrutiny and legislative oversight, while the relevant local and state authorities should publish implementation updates and expenditure information.

Community representatives, farmers’ associations, youth groups, and participating businesses should have opportunities to provide feedback on the programme’s progress.

WHY THIS POLICY MATTERS

Badagry’s development should not be measured only by the number of schools, farms, or roads it has. We should also ask whether young people can find meaningful opportunities after school, whether farmers can earn better returns from their labour, whether women can participate fully in the local economy, and whether the community retains more of the value it produces.

This proposal brings those questions together through a practical approach to agro-industrial development and inclusion.

My position is that local economic development should connect what a community produces, what its young people learn, and what its people can earn. By strengthening the links between agriculture, education, industry, and markets, Badagry can work towards an economy in which residents are not merely part of the production process but have a greater opportunity to benefit from its growth.

The objective is not to promise overnight industrialisation. It is to begin with evidence, involve the people affected, build partnerships around real needs, and measure whether the resulting opportunities improve livelihoods.

Having co-facilitated the review workshops for the Oyo State Social Protection Bill, I observed firsthand the state's efforts to build digital registries for welfare delivery. However, collecting the personal, financial, and biometric data of vulnerable populations creates severe data breach risks if left unregulated at the subnational level.

Drawing from my research with the Nigerian Privacy Law Report (NPLR), I propose integrating a strict Data Privacy and Anonymization Framework directly into Oyo State's social protection implementation strategies. This policy mandates that all citizen data collected for welfare distribution undergo cryptographic anonymization before any public tracking or reporting occurs. By enforcing mandatory Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) across all state safety nets, Oyo State can achieve legislative transparency while firmly protecting the digital rights and privacy of its most vulnerable citizens.

‎The Problem:

‎Lagos State faces a challenge that is also an economic opportunity: how to manage the large volumes of waste generated daily while creating meaningful employment and business opportunities for its growing youth population.

‎Waste management should not end with collecting refuse and transporting it to disposal sites. Properly separated and recovered waste can serve as a resource for manufacturing, agriculture, recycling and, where technically and economically viable, energy production.

‎Japan offers useful lessons in this regard. Its emphasis on reducing, reusing and recycling materials demonstrates how waste management can be connected to resource efficiency and economic development. However, Lagos cannot simply copy Japan’s model. It must adapt relevant practices to its own infrastructure, financial capacity, waste composition and existing institutions.

‎

‎My Policy Proposal:

‎I propose that the Lagos State Government, through the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources and the Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA), establish a Lagos Circular Economy and Youth Enterprise Pilot Programme.

‎Rather than creating another waste-management agency or launching an expensive statewide project immediately, the programme would build on existing waste collection and recycling structures, test a practical model in two selected local government areas, and expand it if the results justify doing so.

‎

‎The programme would have four main components.

‎

‎1. Separate Waste at Source and Connect It to Markets:

‎The pilot would work with selected markets, food businesses, schools, residential communities and other willing waste generators to separate recyclable materials and suitable organic waste from general refuse.

‎

LAWMA would coordinate with existing licensed waste operators, registered recyclers and participating businesses to ensure that separated materials are collected and delivered to appropriate destinations.

‎Before collection begins, participating recyclers and other buyers would be identified to establish reliable arrangements for purchasing or receiving recovered materials. This would help prevent collected recyclables from accumulating without a market.

‎Recyclable plastics, paper, cardboard and metals could be directed to suitable recycling businesses. Suitable organic waste could be processed into compost or considered for biogas production where facilities, technical assessments and viable operating arrangements are available.

‎The objective is to move from a system that largely treats waste as something to dispose of, towards one that recovers value from materials that would otherwise be discarded.

‎

‎2. Create Practical Employment and Support Youth-Owned Enterprises:

‎The programme would create opportunities for young people both as workers and as entrepreneurs.

‎Young people could receive practical training in waste sorting, collection logistics, recycling operations, material recovery, compost production, business management and environmental safety.

‎For young people seeking employment, the programme would connect training to actual vacancies and paid work with participating waste operators, recycling companies and other relevant businesses. Training should not be presented as a job guarantee; rather employable outcomes should be tracked.

‎For aspiring and existing youth entrepreneurs, the government would work with development partners, financial institutions and private-sector recyclers to provide competitively awarded equipment support, small business grants or suitable financing. Support could cover practical needs such as collection containers, weighing scales, protective equipment, storage facilities and basic processing tools.

‎Crucially, financial support would be tied to viable business plans, transparent selection criteria and evidence of progress. Applicants would also need a credible plan for obtaining recyclable materials and selling their recovered products. Where appropriate, participating enterprises would be connected to established recyclers and potential buyers.

‎This would help young people develop businesses that can generate revenue beyond the duration of a government programme.

‎

‎3. Develop Waste-to-Wealth and Waste-to-Energy Opportunities:

‎The programme would assess how different waste streams can create economic value rather than assuming that every type of waste should be processed in the same way.

‎Reusable items should be reused where practical. Recyclable materials should be directed towards appropriate recycling markets. Suitable organic waste could be processed into compost for agricultural and landscaping uses, while biogas production could be explored where technical and financial assessments demonstrate that it is viable.

‎The government should first assess existing facilities and partnerships before committing public funds to new infrastructure.

‎Large-scale waste-to-energy investments should only be considered after feasibility studies establish the availability of suitable feedstock, operating costs, environmental safeguards, technology requirements and reliable demand for the energy produced.

‎This phased approach would allow Lagos to explore the economic potential of waste without committing scarce public resources to expensive projects before their viability has been demonstrated.

‎

‎4. Introduce Transparent Monitoring and Accountability:

‎The pilot should have clear performance indicators, a published implementation plan and regular public progress reports.

‎LAWMA and participating local governments would monitor the quantity of waste collected separately, the volume of materials actually recovered and sold, the number of young people employed, the number of youth-led enterprises supported, and the survival and performance of participating businesses.

‎The programme should distinguish between waste collected and waste successfully recovered. Collection alone does not prove that materials have been recycled or converted into useful products.

‎Information on public expenditure, grant recipients, selection criteria and programme outcomes should be published in an accessible format, subject to appropriate privacy and commercial protections.

‎The Lagos State House of Assembly could support the initiative through legislative oversight, review of existing policies, and consideration of appropriate budgetary provisions. This would help ensure that implementation is monitored rather than left as a policy announcement without measurable results.

‎

‎IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

‎

‎Phase One; Assessment and Preparation(Months 1–3):

‎Conduct a baseline assessment in two selected local government areas to identify priority waste streams, existing collection and recycling arrangements, available processing capacity, potential buyers and youth employment opportunities. Consult residents, waste operators, recyclers, youth groups and relevant government agencies.

‎

‎Phase Two; Pilot Implementation(Months 4–9):

‎Launch source-separation activities in selected communities and markets. Recruit and train young participants, establish agreements with recycling businesses, and provide equipment or financial support to qualified youth-led enterprises through a transparent process.

‎

‎Phase Three; Evaluation and Improvement(Months 10–12):

‎Publish the results, assess the programme’s costs and benefits, examine whether supported businesses are generating revenue, and identify implementation gaps. Expansion should depend on independently verifiable results and the availability of sustainable funding.

‎

‎MEASURING SUCCESS

‎

‎The pilot should establish a baseline before setting final waste-recovery targets. Its performance would be assessed using indicators such as:

‎

‎- The quantity of recyclable and organic waste successfully recovered and delivered to verified destinations.

‎- The number of young people who obtain paid employment through participating organisations.

‎- The number of youth-led enterprises supported and the proportion still operating after the pilot.

‎- The value of recovered materials sold and the revenue generated by participating enterprises.

‎- The cost per unit of waste recovered and the amount of public funding required to sustain the programme.

‎- The proportion of supported businesses that establish repeat customers and reliable supply arrangements.

‎- Compliance with environmental, occupational safety and waste-handling requirements.

‎

‎The programme should publish periodic results so that residents can assess what public resources have achieved.

‎

‎FUNDING AND SUSTAINABILITY

‎

‎Rather than relying entirely on government funding, the pilot should combine an agreed public-sector allocation with private-sector participation and, where available, support from development partners.

‎

‎Public funding would support coordination, baseline research, monitoring, training and carefully targeted enterprise support. Private-sector partners would contribute through their existing collection and processing operations, purchases of recovered materials, technical expertise and other mutually agreed arrangements.

‎

‎Over time, participating enterprises should be able to sustain an increasing share of their operations through sales and service contracts rather than depending indefinitely on grants.

‎

‎WHY THIS POLICY MATTERS

‎

‎Lagos has already expressed its intention to move towards a circular economy, and LAWMA has existing recycling arrangements and partnerships. The opportunity, therefore, is not simply to announce another environmental initiative. It is to strengthen the connection between waste recovery, viable businesses and measurable youth employment.

‎

‎This proposal adapts a relevant lesson from Japan: materials should be viewed not only as waste to be discarded, but also as resources whose value can be recovered. The approach must, however, be tailored to Lagos’s local conditions and supported by practical infrastructure, functioning markets, responsible investment and effective oversight.

‎

‎My position is that a cleaner Lagos and a more economically empowered youth population should not be treated as separate policy objectives. With a carefully designed pilot, transparent monitoring and genuine partnerships between government and the private sector, waste recovery can become a practical pathway towards both.

‎

‎The goal is not to promise that waste will suddenly solve Lagos’s unemployment or environmental challenges. It is to demonstrate, measure and expand a workable system that makes responsible waste management economically worthwhile.

Ondo State can create a simple Local Service Tracker where residents can report problems in their communities: damaged roads, broken streetlights, blocked drainage, poor waste management, abandoned public facilities and other basic issues.

Reports should go live immediately after submission, with moderation taking place afterward to remove spam, duplicates or inappropriate content. Each report should show the location, date reported, the responsible agency and its current status.

Government agencies should then have a clear timeline to respond, while residents can see whether an issue is reported, acknowledged, being addressed or resolved.

A simple monthly dashboard can show how many issues were reported, how many were resolved and which agencies are performing.

The point is not to create another complicated government platform. It is to make government more responsive and give citizens a simple way to see a problem, report it, track it and know who is responsible for fixing it.

Ondo State can pilot this in a few local governments and expand it based on what works.

The Problem

Across communities in Ibarapa East, residents may experience challenges such as poor farm-to-market roads, inadequate public school facilities and gaps in primary healthcare. Yet many citizens struggle to establish whether these problems appear in government budgets, which agency is responsible, whether funds were released, or what role their elected representatives and legislative oversight committees can play in addressing them. Publishing a budget is not enough if citizens cannot understand what it means for their communities. Likewise, raising concerns about public services is less effective when residents lack access to reliable information and clear channels for seeking answers.

The Proposed Solution

I propose a Community-to-Budget Accountability Initiative, beginning with a pilot in Ibarapa East Local Government Area of Oyo State. The initiative would connect everyday community concerns to publicly available budget information, government project records and the relevant legislative oversight processes.

The initiative would have four components:

1. Document community priorities. Work with residents, youth groups, farmers, community associations and civil society organisations to identify and document priority public-service concerns. Initial areas could include rural roads, primary healthcare and public-school infrastructure. Each concern would be recorded with its location, available evidence and the community's description of the problem.

2. Trace the relevant public information. Where records are available, examine Oyo State budget documents, appropriation laws, project information and official updates to determine whether a relevant allocation or project can be identified. The process would clearly distinguish between a budget allocation, a reported release of funds, documented expenditure and a completed project. An allocation alone would never be presented as proof that money was spent or that a project was delivered.

3. Translate findings into citizen-friendly briefs. Produce short, accessible explanations of what the available records show, what remains unverified, which public institution appears responsible and what questions citizens can reasonably ask. Summaries could be provided in clear English and carefully reviewed Yoruba, alongside short audio explanations distributed through accessible channels such as WhatsApp and community meetings.

4. Create a responsible feedback and oversight pathway. Help residents direct evidence-based questions and documented concerns to the appropriate public institutions and elected representatives. Where relevant, citizens could be guided towards existing complaint channels, public hearings or legislative oversight processes. The initiative would document responses and unresolved questions without claiming powers to compel government action or independently investigate alleged wrongdoing.

Implementation and Accountability

The pilot would run for an initial 90 days, subject to access to reliable public records and cooperation from relevant community stakeholders. It would begin with a small number of documented community concerns rather than attempting to monitor every project in the local government area. Success would be assessed through measurable indicators: the number of community concerns documented, the number linked to verifiable public records, the accessibility and accuracy of published briefs, citizen understanding of the information, and the number of questions submitted to the appropriate institutions and responses received. All claims would be source-linked and checked before publication. The initiative would protect personal information, distinguish verified facts from allegations, and avoid partisan campaigning.

Expected Impact

This initiative would give residents a practical way to move from saying, “Our community needs this project,” to asking informed questions: Was the project included in the budget? Which institution is responsible? What do the available records show about implementation? What explanation or oversight action is needed? Starting in Ibarapa East would provide a focused model that could later be adapted to other local government areas and South-West states. It would not replace government budget portals, legislative records or existing accountability organisations. It would help citizens understand and use those resources more effectively. The central idea is simple: public money should be traceable, public decisions should be understandable, and citizens should have a practical way to ask informed questions about the services that affect their lives.

I propose the creation of an Oyo Open Assembly platform that makes legislative information easy for citizens to access and understand. The platform would provide plain-language summaries of bills, passed laws, budgets, committee activities, and other important decisions of the Oyo State House of Assembly.

Information should be available in English and Yoruba to reach more residents, including those with limited formal education or internet access. The initiative could also include community outreach, downloadable summaries, and a channel for citizens to submit questions and feedback.

This policy would promote transparency, accountability, and public participation. It would help young people, community groups, journalists, and ordinary citizens understand how laws are made and how legislative decisions affect their lives.

Executive Summary

Between 2010 and 2018, Osun State under Governor Rauf Aregbesola built one of the most visible state-level social protection systems in Nigeria and paired it with a securitysupport model in which the state funded and equipped federal security agencies. The social programmes (youth empowerment, school feeding, free ambulance services, elderly and destitute support, and rural enterprise) reached citizens directly and drew a learning visit from UNICEF and officials of other states. The security model centred on equipping the Nigeria Police and other agencies and on engaging youth in community service as an alternative to idleness. This brief argues that Osun should reintroduce and modernise the core of these policies, while correcting the weaknesses that critics identified, chiefly fiscal sustainability, weak institutionalisation, and limited independent evaluation. It recommends a phased, legally anchored and fiscally ring-fenced approach rather than a simple restoration of the old programmes.

1. Background: The Aregbesola Policy Framework

The administration's agenda was set out in the Six-Point Integral Action Plan, known as the "Green Book" (My Pact with the People of Osun). Social protection and security were treated as linked: income support and community engagement for the young, and visible state support for security agencies.

1.1 Social Interventions

a. O'YES (Osun Youth Empowerment Scheme), introduced 20 December 2010

Core purpose

Deployed young volunteers in public works, traffic management, teaching support and environmental work, with exit programmes meant to give them skills and start-up pathways. Described by supporters as a "strategic youth management" tool to reduce poverty-driven idleness and violence.

b. O'MEAL (Osun Elementary School Feeding and Health Programme)

Core purpose

Free meals for primary pupils (reported at over 250,000 pupils in Primary 1-4 on school days), supporting enrolment, nutrition and attendance.

c. Opon Imo (Tablet of Knowledge)

Core purpose

Tablets preloaded with textbooks and past WAEC and JAMB questions for senior secondary students; reported to have drawn UNESCO recognition.

d. O'AMBULANCE and free medical programmes

Core purpose

Emergency medical transport and free care targeting the vulnerable.

Reports indicate a large share of O'YES volunteers were absorbed as ambulance paramedics.

e. O'REAP (Osun Rural Enterprise and Agricultural Programme)

Core purpose

Support for farmers, rural enterprise and land access, including the Land Bank scheme.

f. O'REHAB and welfare schemes

Core purpose

Rehabilitation of destitute and mentally challenged persons; welfare support for the elderly; empowerment of widows.

The administration reported direct social investment of about N30 billion by around 2018. UNICEF later led delegations from other states to study the model, and the African Development Bank was reported to have scored Osun well on social investment. These endorsements, while promotional in part, indicate that the programmes had documented data systems and a replicable design.

1.2 Security Policies

Under Nigeria's constitutional arrangement, policing is a federal function, so the state's strategy was to support, not replace, conventional agencies. The administration reported:

i. Purchase and donation of 25 Armoured Personnel Carriers to the Nigeria Police Force, plus patrol vehicles distributed across the police, army, FRSC, NDLEA, Immigration and NSCDC.

ii. A surveillance helicopter for aerial security monitoring, also intended for emergency and medical evacuation support through the state emergency management and ambulance services.

iii. Community-level engagement of youth through O'YES units such as the Traffic Marshals and Sheriff Corps, reducing the pool of unemployed young people vulnerable to criminal or political recruitment.

The then Inspector General of Police publicly commended the state's support for security agencies in 2018. Osun has since maintained a reputation for relative peace compared with many states.

2. Problem Statement

1. Persistent youth unemployment and poverty. Without structured entry points into work and skills, young people remain exposed to economic hardship, political thuggery and crime.

2. Child nutrition, learning and health gaps. Food insecurity and weak learning environments depress enrolment, attendance and outcomes among poor households.

3. Rising and diversifying insecurity. Kidnapping, armed robbery, communal and boundary disputes, and farmer-herder tensions require both enforcement capacity and community trust.

4. Fragmented current architecture. The state now relies on the Osun Security Network Agency (Amotekun Corps), established by law in 2020, alongside federal agencies. Social protection and security have not been deliberately linked in policy as they were in the earlier model. [Note to author: confirm which of the above programmes currently run in Osun, in what form, and at what scale, before submission. See Section 6.]

3. Policy Options

Option A: Maintain the status quo. Rely on existing programmes and the Amotekun-led security arrangement. Low cost and low risk, but it leaves identified gaps unaddressed.

Option B: Full restoration. Reinstate all legacy programmes at original design. Politically recognisable and fast, but it repeats the original sustainability weaknesses and ignores changes in fiscal capacity and technology.

Option C (recommended): Selective, reformed reintroduction. Revive the highest impact programmes, anchor them in law, ring-fence funding, add independent evaluation, and integrate them with the existing Amotekun and federal-agency security framework.

4. Recommendations

4.1 Social Interventions

1. Relaunch a reformed youth scheme (O'YES 2.0). Retain community service deployments, but make the exit pathway the core: certified skills training, digital and agricultural tracks, start-up grants and partnerships with microfinance banks and the private sector. Cap stipend duration and set clear exit targets.

2. Reinstate school feeding with local sourcing. Buy from Osun smallholder farmers and caterers so the programme doubles as a rural income stimulus, and use the school platform for basic health screening and deworming.

3. Modernise Opon Imo. Refresh the content, align it with current curricula and CBTbased JAMB and WAEC formats, and integrate it with teacher training and device maintenance, since hardware without support decays quickly.

4. Restore and expand the ambulance and emergency response network. Link it with the state emergency management agency, using trained former youth volunteers as paramedics and dispatch staff.

5. Protect the vulnerable. Maintain elderly welfare, widows' empowerment and destitute rehabilitation through a single beneficiary registry, linked to the National Social Register, to avoid duplication and leakage.

4.2 Security Policy

1. Resume structured state support to federal security agencies (vehicles, communications, surveillance equipment) under a published annual support plan with asset registers and maintenance budgets.

2. Integrate community youth service with Amotekun and traditional security structures. Use trained, supervised volunteers for traffic, community watch and information-sharing roles. Armed functions should remain with trained and lawfully empowered personnel only.

3. Invest in surveillance and emergency coordination. Consider a joint command-andcontrol centre bringing together police, Amotekun, the fire service and emergency medical services.

4. Strengthen local conflict resolution. Establish early-warning and mediation mechanisms with traditional rulers and community leaders for boundary and intercommunal disputes, which are a recurrent security risk in parts of the state.

5. Build accountability. Maintain an independent complaints mechanism and human rights training for all personnel.

4.3 Governance and Financing

1. Legal anchor. Enact a State Social Protection Law to give the programmes a statutory basis that survives changes of administration.

2. Ring-fenced funding. Create a dedicated social protection and security support fund with a fixed minimum budget line, supplemented by partnerships with development partners such as UNICEF and multilateral banks.

3. Independent monitoring and evaluation. Commission baseline and periodic external evaluation (universities, development partners), and publish results.

4. Transparency. Publish beneficiary numbers, spending and outcomes quarterly through an open data portal.

5. Phasing. Pilot in selected local government areas, evaluate after 12 months, then scale.

5. Risks and Mitigation

Fiscal sustainability. The earlier period was associated with heavy borrowing and public debate over salary arrears and debt servicing.

Mitigation: Costed phasing, a ring-fenced fund, cofinancing from partners, and a cap on programme commitments relative to revenue.

Political capture. Programmes can be seen as partisan instruments, particularly youth deployment.

Mitigation: Statutory basis, transparent selection criteria, independent oversight board.

Programme dependency. Volunteers may rely on stipends without moving to sustainable work.

Mitigation: Fixed tenure and mandatory exit milestones.

Security overreach and rights abuses.

Mitigation: Clear legal mandates, training, independent complaints mechanism, and limits on armed roles for volunteers.

Weak data.

Mitigation: Single registry, digital enrolment, external audit.

6. Evidence Gaps and Next Steps

The claims about reach and impact in this brief rely largely on government statements, press reports and endorsements by partner agencies, not on independent impact evaluations. Before this brief is acted on, the following should be verified:

The current operational status, funding and coverage of each programme under the present administration.

Independent evidence of outcomes (enrolment, nutrition, employment, security incidence) from sources such as the National Bureau of Statistics, UNICEF and academic studies.

Actual financing costs and the debt position associated with the original programmes.

Current security data for Osun, including crime incidence and the performance of the Amotekun Corps.

7. Conclusion

The Aregbesola administration's experience shows that a state government can deliver direct social protection and support security institutions with a coherent, citizen-facing programme. Its limits were as instructive as its achievements: ambitious design without a legal anchor and a sustainable funding base is vulnerable to reversal. A selective, reformed reintroduction, legally protected, financed through a dedicated fund and independently evaluated, would let Osun keep what worked while avoiding the earlier weaknesses.